Eric: Thanks. I could have sworn the native form *didn't* work for me in 
Canary when I posted this, but it works now. So I was either hallucinating, 
or the problem was fixed quickly. Either way, glad to know I can /content/ 
as expected.

On Sunday, March 16, 2014 2:40:25 PM UTC-7, Eric Bidelman wrote:
>
> That works for me in the latest Canary (35.0.1895.0). For polyfill 
> support, you still need to add the equivalent polyfill-next-selector {} 
> rule. This should work in Canary (with flags) and stable:
>
> http://jsbin.com/gacogeda/3/edit
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Jan Miksovsky <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Ah, thanks. I'd seen discussion of /shadow/ and /shadow-deep/, but not 
>> /content/.
>>
>> Should /content/ work right now? The updated jsbin at 
>> http://jsbin.com/gacogeda/2/edit still doesn't seem to work. Or are we 
>> in some place where ::content no longer works, but /content/ doesn't work 
>> yet?
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 14, 2014 5:41:47 PM UTC-7, Steve Orvell wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it was changed to match the spec here: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/
>>> shadow-styling/.
>>>
>>> The ::content pseudo-element was removed. The /content/ combinator was 
>>> added. So your rule could be:
>>>
>>> content /content/ * { color: red; }
>>>
>>> Note, a combinator must have some selector to the left of it.
>>>
>>> In addition the ^ and ^^ combinators were renamed to /shadow/ and 
>>> /shadow-deep/.
>>>
>>> Hope that helps.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Jan Miksovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just upgraded Canary to 35.0.1892.2, and CSS rules with ::content 
>>>> CSS selectors no longer seem to be applied as expected. I'm wondering if 
>>>> the ::content syntax changed recently.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I know, the syntax for ::content looks like:
>>>>
>>>> ::content * {
>>>>   color: red;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> This is what's shown in the Guide to Styling article on the Polymer 
>>>> site, for example.
>>>>
>>>> Repro: http://jsbin.com/gacogeda/1/edit. This jsbin works in an older 
>>>> Canary (35.0.1887.0), but not in the latest Canary.
>>>>
>>>> I also happened to notice a recent Polymer checkin that used a 
>>>> different content syntax like:
>>>>
>>>> ::content(*) {
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> But I haven't seen a breaking change announcement anywhere — did I miss 
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> msgid/polymer-dev/ad7d90f6-16de-43b2-9ce1-20d019f6ff36%
>>>> 40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/ad7d90f6-16de-43b2-9ce1-20d019f6ff36%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/42675d85-a29e-45b2-bfa7-ecded1ca6b98%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/42675d85-a29e-45b2-bfa7-ecded1ca6b98%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/208ac81a-4d90-4d37-a032-490ae0416540%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to