Hey Paul,

Just wanted to say that I think this is a great idea. I'd even expand on it
a bit; create a core-storage component that can be used with other types of
storage layers like IDB. We're heads down right now getting ready for
Google I/O, but I'd like to revisit this sometime in July.

Thanks for the suggestion!


On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Paul Grenier <[email protected]> wrote:

> I suggest a 'core-sessionstorage' element or an element which allows
> configuration to switch between local and session.
>
> *Development Effort:*
>
> The development would merely be a find/replace exercise on the existing
> 'core-localstorage' element.
>
> *Reasons for this element:*
>
>    1. Closes attack vectors for applications used on shared computers or
>    in kiosks.
>    2. Encourages smaller memory footprint for applications
>
>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Polymer" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/4137af70-4751-45ec-9e2c-a3170497c9c2%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/4137af70-4751-45ec-9e2c-a3170497c9c2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CACGqRCCRMmTCy1dNTx1_ZbLtUwna7XgW6e5bWH4MjEKEUqaJaw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to