Ah now it is clear, thank you for explaining. You guys are amazing. I 
apologize for my ignorance :P

On Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:01:00 PM UTC-7, Scott Miles wrote:
>
> >> when used with "-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch"
>
> The method used to make touch-scrolling smooth on iOS includes eliminating 
> the chance for JavaScript to do anything. So by definition, this flag is 
> incompatible with `core-list`, which is attempting to virtualize large 
> lists via JavaScript.
>
> >> should we expect any type of official scroller component in the future? 
>
> Yes.
>
> >>  "-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch" has mostly eliminated the need for 
> fancy JS scrolling optimizations or simulations but that positioning, 
> snapping, pull to refresh, zooming, infinite scrolling, etc are common nice 
> to haves
>
> I believe that statement is in opposition to itself. As above, native 
> touch-scrolling disables JavaScript, and removes the ability to implement 
> any of the 'common nice to haves', and therefore requires 'fancy JS 
> scrolling' is required to have any custom behavior.
>
> Optimizing core-list and improving scroll behaviors is one of our major 
> goals, stay tuned for updates.
>
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> core-list appears to break on iOS (items stop being rendered) when used 
>> with "-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch". Is enabling smooth mobile 
>> scrolling in the works for it?
>>
>> Also curious around the plan for mobile scrolling in general - should we 
>> expect any type of official scroller component in the future? I'm not 
>> completely current on the state of mobile scrolling/lists but my 
>> understanding is that "-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch" mostly eliminated 
>> the need for fancy JS scrolling optimizations or simulations but that 
>> positioning, snapping, pull to refresh, zooming, infinite scrolling, etc 
>> are common nice to haves in a scroller widget. Or is this something we 
>> should plan to handle ourselves?
>>  
>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/4e6c892c-dbc3-4a71-aa50-7f2552dab1ba%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/4e6c892c-dbc3-4a71-aa50-7f2552dab1ba%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/601e111a-999d-4676-b27d-b367bfabfcf6%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to