Hi Eric,

excellent demo! Is it possible to access the code? 

for a large number of architects, designers and programmers is of great 
interest to us to know how to make a real-world application (with MVC or 
SOA -. MVVM / MVP, dependency injection, etc) 

The big question is: how to start? 

you are a great evangelist of this technology, that changes paradigm to us 
, what ideas do you have? 

Thanks for your attention, 

John 

El sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 08:37:56 UTC+2, Eric Bidelman escribió:
>
> I created a SPA example for my Google I/O presentation but didn't have 
> time to show it:
> http://polymer-change.appspot.com/demos/spa.html
>
> It uses the flatiron-director component (
> https://github.com/PolymerLabs/flatiron-director) for url routing. We'll 
> clean this up, use core-animated-pages, and other new material design 
> elements, and write an article on how to use components for routing and 
> SPA-setups. Sound good?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:12 PM, 'Scott Miles' via Polymer <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> We built Polymer to be just exactly "the kind we like" (
>> http://i.imgur.com/PIfD0.jpg), so we tend to use it exclusively.
>>
>> But our intent has always been to support interoperability, so that users 
>> could choose whatever superstructure they prefer.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:37 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> First of all, big thanks to Mo for asking the question. I've just 
>>> watched the Polymer videos from Google I/O 2014 on the technology and it 
>>> looks amazing.
>>>
>>> I would like to ask if the Polymer team considers the platform ready to 
>>> be used as a standalone system to build single page applications? or do you 
>>> recommend a framework of some kind (is Angular 2.0 ready enough yet?) or 
>>> EmberJS to provide the application structure?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, June 27, 2014 10:37:33 AM UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have a couple question about the future of AngularJS, specifically 
>>>> about the upcoming 2.0 version, and how it relates to Polymer. I've been 
>>>> through previous posts on the forums, articles about it on the web and all 
>>>> the answers I could find from last year.
>>>>
>>>> Polymer seems to focus on composition of elements on a page, these 
>>>> elements can be visible or not and can have associated behaviour, combined 
>>>> with data binding and event dispatching it makes it very easy to share 
>>>> state and trigger updates when information is changed. Polymer doesn't 
>>>> seem 
>>>> to address the problem of routing in a Single Page Application (although 
>>>> there appears to be a few fledgling attempts in the Web Components 
>>>> community to provide "router" elements).
>>>>
>>>> In the Topeka example application from the Polymer team, the "sign in" 
>>>> view doesn't appear to have any kind of representation in the URL. No 
>>>> hash-fragment, no direct way to reach that view. They do use HTML5 
>>>> pushState for history though, although this is manually wired up.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can see Polymer handles templating, data binding, data 
>>>> persistence (via "core-localstorage" etc), modularity (via HTML imports) 
>>>> and AJAX (via "core-ajax"). The only things that is missing is routing.
>>>>
>>>> Most questions about how Polymer fits into other frameworks generates 
>>>> the response "They're just DOM elements, anything that understands the DOM 
>>>> will understand Polymer elements." This isn't strictly fair when we can 
>>>> already see that the Angular 2.0 templating will need some additional work 
>>>> to integrate with Web Components: https://github.com/angular/
>>>> templating/issues/9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where does Angular 2.0 fit alongside Polymer if routing is addressed? 
>>>> How will they work together? Does Polymer plan to enable support for 
>>>> building Single Page Applications?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Mo.
>>>>
>>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/cbc9f816-1e03-4d67-a170-bcdb38ccc621%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/cbc9f816-1e03-4d67-a170-bcdb38ccc621%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAHbmOLYWrFw5RqNXmZQLRwr068bYtsAgR0fK6eYN-cOsa3g83A%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAHbmOLYWrFw5RqNXmZQLRwr068bYtsAgR0fK6eYN-cOsa3g83A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/df1809b5-5900-408a-a4ea-6e3e84990f03%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to