Where to draw the line on encapsulation is a contentious issue, we tend to the line away from isolation, but there are inevitable costs.
IMO, this idea goes too far toward exposing element internals. The notion today is that the element author should expose those configuration points as properties and map them to the shadow-dom internals as appropriate. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Chris Gallo <[email protected]> wrote: > For example, it would be useful to be able to say things like: > <paper-menu-button $.icon.size="48> > or > <.... $-icon-size=".."> etc. > Where the core-icon in paper-menu-button would have an id of 'icon'. > > One could use the same pattern for adjusting the shadow dom: > <shadow $.myelem.vertical ....> > > There's a thread about composing the shadow dom that this relates to...but > that was getting long already so I'm posting here. > Any takers? :) > > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Polymer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/2d4977b9-6576-4838-a0ea-41378b8a3e2c%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/2d4977b9-6576-4838-a0ea-41378b8a3e2c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAHbmOLaE07tVLnk9a%3Dq1GooLwmR6KvmKen36UmYsH1rtmjg%3D6w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
