Thanks, I did find an existing issue on the subject.  It says they did add 
support, so it must be something with my implementation.

Thanks for the help though, I have it all working as needed!

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:09:45 PM UTC-5, Rob Dodson wrote:
>
> I would recommend raising an issue with the LESS team. Both ::shadow and 
> /deep/ have shipped in Chrome (and I believe Opera) so they're valid CSS 
> that need to be supported
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Takayoshi Kochi <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> ::shadow only applies to the shadow roots in the current tree scope, 
>> while /deep/ is a combinator
>> which penetrates any number of shadow root boundaries.  So if you have an 
>> element with #ink
>> in nested shadow roots, only the rule with /deep/ can match.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Scott Beeson <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> the "deep" solution doesn't work for me.  Possibly because I'm using 
>>> LESS?  My compiler doesn't seem to like it.  The "shadow" solution does 
>>> work however.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:49:31 PM UTC-5, Scott Beeson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What is the difference between the following solutions?
>>>>
>>>> ::shadow #ink { .. }
>>>>
>>>> /deep/ #ink { .. }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:16:59 PM UTC-5, Marco Scannadinari 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The #ink elements are within shadow DOM, so I believe:
>>>>>
>>>>> * /deep/ #ink { .. }
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:45:40 AM UTC+1, Scott Beeson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried simply adding #ink to my custom CSS, but even with the 
>>>>>> !important attribute it doesn't affect anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/06fb1f72-6d21-4a4a-a0f5-43543a6c61cf%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/06fb1f72-6d21-4a4a-a0f5-43543a6c61cf%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Takayoshi Kochi 
>>
>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADP2%3Dhppd4Kf3qjnuLMc4Zr4ATq7V-%3D-i8ffwaJmPYynMcMTtA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADP2%3Dhppd4Kf3qjnuLMc4Zr4ATq7V-%3D-i8ffwaJmPYynMcMTtA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/2d700bf8-43b1-408d-ada4-21684e17c2a8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to