Whoops...it whizzed by so quickly at the 21 minute mark, that I must have 
missed it the first time around!  Apologies!

I'll try it out!




On Friday, 20 March 2015 15:17:11 UTC-7, Kelly St. John wrote:
>
> Hey Rob,
>
> Thanks for the tips!  Is this the correct video link though?  I viewed the 
> whole segment (which was certainly useful!), but I didn't see any 
> references to the javascript snippet you mentioned, particularly in the 
> performance section you had pointed to (mostly talked about vulcanization). 
>  Maybe a different video clip?
>
> Cheers,
> Kelly
>
>
> On Friday, 20 March 2015 11:32:05 UTC-7, Rob Dodson wrote:
>>
>> Hey Kelly, you can feature detect the existence of the various web 
>> components standards client side using a javascript snippet. I covered it 
>> during part of my talk at Chrome Dev Summit: 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV0hgdMpH28&feature=youtu.be&t=20m3s
>>
>> Basically it checks to see if the all the web component technologies are 
>> supported and if not, it loads webcomponents.js. But you could do more in 
>> that handler like display a message. Another thing to keep in mind is that 
>> Web Components are not polyfillable on really old browsers like IE 8 and 
>> the old stock Android browser. So if you have a high percentage of users 
>> coming from those browsers (and you should be able to check that with 
>> Google Analytics) then you could consider trying to detect that server side 
>> and send down a different page. That's what GitHub does
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kelly St. John <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I just spotted this:  
>>> https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/26  (
>>> https://github.com/uqlibrary/uqlibrary-home/commit/7d97c86b03223653419434d24987f69afe0e3662
>>> )
>>>
>>> Any comments on this approach, or anything better out there?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, 20 March 2015 10:38:33 UTC-7, Kelly St. John wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am in the final stages of building a polymer site/app, but would like 
>>>> to introduce a non-polymer-based splash page to briefly describe the 
>>>> site/app and inform visitors that the site is only compatible with a 
>>>> specific list of devices/evergreen browsers, and encourage them to upgrade 
>>>> if needed.  I could use browser detection to warn only those visitors that 
>>>> are using an incompatible browser/device, or I could present the message 
>>>> to 
>>>> all visitors regardless of which browser/device they are using.  I 
>>>> understand that browser detection has some challenges, and that some 
>>>> people 
>>>> recommend feature detection.  Is there a best practice or any recommended 
>>>> strategies I could or should use to accomplish this goal for a polymer 
>>>> site?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!    
>>>>
>>>  Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Polymer" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/205d487a-73de-4d06-aa9e-950bbf402289%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/205d487a-73de-4d06-aa9e-950bbf402289%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/e3d9e028-c8be-4d81-9a7a-e3b1d627193c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to