There wasn't anything in particular. Someone at my work looked at the compatibility matrix at https://github.com/WebComponents/webcomponentsjs and started asking questions. I was just curious if the new release of Polymer was going to help with the compatibility pieces marked "flaky". Thinking about it now, it seems unlikely unless the Polymer team changed the base polyfills directly (or maybe augmented them).
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 9:30:06 AM UTC-4, Douglas Hubler wrote: > > IE10 worked fine for me in 0.5 sans a pause while it groked the embedded > CSS. If you had specific IE10 issues I would list them and maybe folks can > respond to if things are better or worse or better yet, find them in the > bug db and check their status. > > Considering the basis of the rewrite was for better support for browsers > that do not implement web components, it's somewhat safe to assume the > overall situation is better. > > On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 1:32:38 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: >> >> With 0.8+ being a significant rewrite that is aiming to be lighter weight >> and less "magical", will browser support remain the same? I'm specifically >> interested to know if IE10 support is going to be any better. >> > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/55e18c84-4f53-4765-a4d4-9b7ae5da97af%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
