There's another problem I can see.. replacing `sub[key]` by `get(sub, key)` also won't trigger when `sub[key]`'s value is changed.. since the *value* isn't watched, only the constituants, so if the `sub` doesn't change, and the name of the `key` doesn't change, nothing will trigger an update when you change the value for `sub[key]`..
That's even worse :) Alexandre On Thursday, 4 June 2015 19:42:38 UTC-4, Vartan Simonian wrote: > > I’ve written up a guide to accomplishing two-way data-binding without > bracket-notation > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30631301/polymer-1-0-array-style-path-accessors-alternative-to-bracket-notation-in-exp/30655976#30655976> > > with a sample usage case as an answer to a related question on Stack > Overflow. > > It seems very (unnecessarily?) complex compared to binding to obj[key] - > but of course, I am not yet aware of the performance implications by both > methods, so I cannot call any judgement. > > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/075ba16e-f3a5-4eec-9b7e-fe5ad3a8b369%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
