I'd add that the Polymer element catalog still uses some `/deep/` and `::shadow` styling, so if you're looking at that site, even though it's written using the 1.0 elements, you'll see console warnings.
Cheers, Arthur On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:35 PM, 'Taylor Savage' via Polymer < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Blaze, > > I would highly recommend upgrading to the Polymer 1.0 elements. The 0.5 > components are no longer actively supported and are based on some > experimental API's, whereas the 1.0 elements are actively supported. > > The /deep/ selector is deprecated in the platform and will be eventually > removed from Chrome. Polymer 1.0+ elements do not rely on this selector at > all. The deprecation warning you might see is because iron-flex-layout > <https://github.com/polymerelements/iron-flex-layout> does pull in some > /deep/ styles for backwards-compatibility, but none of the PolymerElements > <https://github.com/polymerelements> rely on this. > > You can learn more about the /deep/ deprecation on the Polymer blog. > <https://blog.polymer-project.org/announcements/2015/12/01/deprecating-deep/> > > Hope that helps! > > Taylor > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:03 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I use some of the polymer 0.5 components in production. In the console >> are emited some deprications related to deep and shadow dom. So i was >> wondering if 0.5 components are based on experimental apis? Is it posible >> that the components brake totally in near future? If this happen, can we >> force the lib to use the polifil for every browser? >> >> I also see some of this deprications logged in the console when I open >> the 1.0 polymer components on the polymer.org web page. Are this >> components also not stable and can have big api changes in neer future? >> >> Tnx >> Blaze >> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Polymer" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/3251deb2-43ab-4c0d-825a-1baf30d99fe7%40googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Polymer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAN-z2fsPDukL4d%2B_VNut-8VR8DxtE5TY4JooLV1wx5%2BvpHgX8g%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAN-z2fsPDukL4d%2B_VNut-8VR8DxtE5TY4JooLV1wx5%2BvpHgX8g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADSbU_xPU21RONAaDt7FA3Tgfp58SjOJCPdFxtK14mik88XBVw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
