Tomek, It looks like AJ (@garlicnation) grabbed one of issues recently (12 days ago), but seeing as there are quite a few issues and PR's here that are close to or above a month I have reached out to Taylor about these and about discussing a process to better address future issues and PRs in a more efficient manner. Can't make any promises but, I'll see what comes of it.
-Karl Tiedt On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Tomek W <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Vladimir for starting this topic, > > Karl Could you poke someone for me as well? ;) > > Here is the small list of PRs I have made > > - Polymer: Set latest firefox addon for testing > PR https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/pull/3761 > issue https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/issues/3760 > > I feel it is needed, as Polymer is being tested on outdated version > > I have created an issue, signed the CLA, and believe that extremely simple > one to review and merge. > > - WebComponentsJS: Execute onload callback for empty resources > PR https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/pull/536 > issue https://github.com/webcomponents/webcomponentsjs/issues/535 > > I feel it's needed as polyfill different than to spec and native browser > CLA, issue and tests ar in place > > - PolymerElements/iron-component-page: master branch is hard-coded > Issue https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/101 > PR https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/pull/102 > > There is also another issue that popped out that would be fixed by my PR > https://github.com/PolymerElements/iron-component-page/issues/44 > > I really try to respect contribution as much as I can > > As Vladimir, I would also appreciate some feedback. > > Thanks, > Tomek Wytrębowicz > > > W dniu poniedziałek, 11 lipca 2016 23:04:40 UTC+2 użytkownik Vladimir > Iftodi napisał: >> >> Awesome. >> >> Thank you very much. >> >> On 11 July 2016 at 22:33, Karl Tiedt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the additional information, I'll see if I can prod a couple >>> people into responding, it does appear that you have done everything >>> correct on your side regarding opening an issue and a PR. I can't look at >>> the code right now (nor could I approve it) but, hopefully someone from the >>> Polymer Team can get back to you soon via Github. >>> >>> -Karl Tiedt >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your reply. >>>> >>>> These are the two pull requests I have made, they allow to position the >>>> label on the left side of a checkbox/toggle-button. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-checkbox/pull/126 >>>> https://github.com/PolymerElements/paper-toggle-button/pull/95 >>>> >>>> As for your other question, they are PR that I felt were needed, but I >>>> have created an issue as that's what I understood must be done related to >>>> the contribution guide document. >>>> This feature is something I have a need for and googling gave me no >>>> clean answer for polymer yet there are some questions on stackoverflow on >>>> how to do this with other frameworks/widget libraries/etc. >>>> >>>> I have read the contribution guide and tried to respect it as much as I >>>> could. I have made an issue related to the pull request, even made tests. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate some feedback, currently I am completely unaware of >>>> the state of those pull requests. Are they deliberately ignored? Is the >>>> feature not needed? It doesn't respect the contribution guide/code >>>> style/variable naming/etc; Maybe it hasn't even been looked at yet, but >>>> still I would greatly appreciate some feedback, a comment stating the state >>>> it is in, instead of just silence. >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> >>>> On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 7:40:04 PM UTC+2, Karl Tiedt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This isn't an uncommon problem with any Open Source project... >>>>> however, your email really does nothing to help resolve your concerns... >>>>> If >>>>> I were to look at only the information provided here in this email, I >>>>> would >>>>> be forced to assume that your Pull Requests contain a similar lack of >>>>> information and that *may* be why they have not received more visible >>>>> attention. However, let us assume that is not the case and look a little >>>>> closer, just at this email. >>>>> >>>>> If you are going to voice concern over a problem relating to two very >>>>> specific things (your PRs in this case), you should provide context for >>>>> those things so that your email has a snowball's chance in hell of >>>>> eliciting a positive change. Currently what we (the community know) is >>>>> equivalent to a bad bug report "It broke". However, if you provide the >>>>> information related to those PRs, like do they address open bugs or were >>>>> they just PR's you felt were needed? You'll get a lot farther when this >>>>> information is readily available to those you are seeking to prod into >>>>> action. >>>>> >>>>> -Karl Tiedt >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been almost a month since I've opened 2 pull requests, they have >>>>>> been completely ignored, I have not received a single comment related to >>>>>> the state of my pull requests. >>>>>> >>>>>> I find this very discouraging and doubt many developers would want to >>>>>> contribute to polymer if their respective pull requests/contributions are >>>>>> treated in a similar manner. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/940c3e70-c5e6-4277-9c42-29a12b62c8cd%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/39195246-ee65-4ad5-a0f1-7e3baed0dd9f%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/39195246-ee65-4ad5-a0f1-7e3baed0dd9f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADNgbTH8XEbHMrKSxPT6fCg19mMSnzPjAJ6KrA79Txb%2BFwp6NA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
