The use case is to support generated code from the protocol buffers library
so that those objects can be used directly as property values. Protobuf
objects use getFoo and setFoo style accessors. They are typically nested
deeply and used for communication back and forth with the server. The idea
is to use a protobuf object as the property value in my element and
reference its numerous fields from the template without translating back
and forth to an object with simple setters/getters.

The myThing object in the demo is a stand-in for a protobuf object. Access
in JavaScript should be through the getFoo syntax.

What do you mean that this may be possible with a "code extension?" I'm
happy to do this only in my own app through a mix-in, but I don't see how
to accomplish that without an API for resolving paths.


On Oct 25, 2017 7:44 AM, "Karl Tiedt" <[email protected]> wrote:

> First off, I highly doubt an API change is gonna happen at this point to
> support, yet another data access method, when you can most likely
> accomplish it via code extensions or a base element class that enables this
> feature in the elements that require it. Second off, I dont see anywhere in
> your example you actually use this prescribed notion of setFoo, getFoo
> other than extending the demo object to add those methods... Maybe I am
> missing something (it is early for me)? It could simply be that I do not
> see how you expect to leverage this since you don't appear to call any of
> these proposed APIs in your plnkr... Trying ele.getName() fails,
> ele.myThing.getName() works but ele.myThing.name does not...
>
> Can you more clearly elaborate on what your goal is here?
>
> -Karl Tiedt
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm using objects that only expose data through getFoo() and setFoo()
>> methods. Would Polymer developers be supportive of amending Polymer to
>> support this use case?
>>
>> (The objects in question are JavaScript protocol buffer messages.)
>>
>> From looking over lib/utils/path.html
>> <https://github.com/Polymer/polymer/blob/0b23e746bf2232732a322b7614fd0dcf3a8b2a73/lib/utils/path.html#L210>,
>> it seems fairly straightforward to hook into the path code. For an
>> inelegant example, consider this plnkr
>> <http://plnkr.co/edit/uv8EjdYLRqtU6nGOzVZm>.
>>
>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Polymer" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms
>> gid/polymer-dev/0d0af3dc-f58d-4502-b6e8-f8c48c130ec8%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/0d0af3dc-f58d-4502-b6e8-f8c48c130ec8%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Polymer" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CA%2BjYSA-R3fo%2BJW_ip_MrMpbuSLa%2B5hN8eLNGLiVYiF2s6gTvKg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to