I remain in favour of phasing out SVN in favour of Git. For Walther: I find Git much more intuitive than Mercurial, but thankfully there are bidirectional bridges between the systems, so one can always use their preferred one.
On 7 August 2015 at 23:36, Walther Neuper <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2015-08-07 14:38, David Matthews wrote: > >> The original idea was to experiment with github but port the changes to >> svn on SourceForge. In practice the git repository has got a bit ahead and >> there are quite a few changes that I need to apply to bring svn into line. >> I had in mind keeping svn going as far as the next release but I'm >> wondering about that now. Having two "official" repositories is >> complicated. >> >> What are people's opinions about phasing out SVN in favour of Git? >> > > Why not use Mercurial instead of Git, which can do as much as Git but is > simpler to use for novices? > > Walther > > _______________________________________________ > polyml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml >
_______________________________________________ polyml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml
