On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 10:43, Makarius <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/05/2019 17:46, Matthew Fernandez wrote: > > > > If I understand the version numbering correctly, those MinGW versions > are derived from GCC 4.9.3 which supports C++11. > > Such claims of supporting certain standards are rarely accurate. It > usually takes years to make things really work. See also this reply on > the old thread: > http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/pipermail/polyml/2017-December/002139.html
Agreed, but you can get a pretty accurate record from https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx11 which shows everything relevant was completed before 4.9. In practice, I have not experienced anything that makes me doubt this table. > I am all for bumping up that old MinGW build environment, but it is up > to David Matthews to do something about it, or leave the status-quo > unchanged. > > > Makarius >
_______________________________________________ polyml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/polyml
