On Jun 7, 2011, at 1:38, Tim Bray wrote: > On 07/06/11 04:43, Anssi Johansson wrote: >> My only concern at this time is that it's going to take about 18 hours to >> get my IPv6 NTP servers' score from -9.8 to the acceptable score of 10. >> There's still about 20.5 hours to go until June 8th 00:00 UTC, so if the >> monitoring code was deployed in 2.5 hours from now and no probes failed (a >> bold assumption), the IPv6 servers' scores would be high enough to be >> included in the pool. > > > I have some IPv6 servers in the real pool management interface. Ones I > added months ago.
http://news.ntppool.org/2011/06/experimentally-enabling-ipv6.html http://news.ntppool.org/2011/06/monitoring-of-some-servers-tem.html > One of them has a score of 2.9 now, so looks like the real pool is monitoring > IPv6 servers. http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/2001:a88:4::3 - if it will let > you see without logging in. And in DNS! $ dig +short -t aaaa 2.pool.ntp.org 2607:fc18:dead:beef::9 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe96:72b5 2001:1900:201e:6:6e62:6dff:fee5:821 > I guess that means it is worth putting IPv6 servers into the real pool > management interface. As in http://www.pool.ntp.org/manage/servers Yes, please add away. - ask _______________________________________________ pool mailing list pool@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
