Thanks Ian, > It would be great if we could move everything to github - even a plain copy > in its current state - as the git tools would make collaboration much > easier.
I would have no objection to a 'complete' version of poplog based (initially) on what I currently have in Birmingham then rationalised. That would require working out how this should relate to Waldek's site. The 'current state' of a usable system with the Birmingham addons requires some messy unpacking and repacking of the version on Waldek's github site. > I originally made the https://github.com/poplog "organisation" account, but > I did it under such an old email address that I simply don't have access to > it any more (even github has killed that user). But we/I can make another > (and maybe reclaim the old when we have some traction). > > So, to begin with, we have to tackle one of the 2 hardest things in > computing: what name to give it? :-) Perhaps openpoplog (though it always > was)? Any other suggestions? Or just poplog? > When we have the repo we can discuss what should go in it... There's also an unresolved problem about interrupt handling if motif is used. Typing Ctrl C into a graphic window kills poplog instead of going to poplog 'top level'. However, in an XVed window it works as expected. So perhaps there's something in the code for creating XVed windows that should be added to the code for creating other graphical windows if motif is installed. This was not a problem in 32 bit Poplog. But I am out of my depth and have no spare time to investigate this. Aaron
