On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:45:45AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > On Sunday 29 April 2007 00:07, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > > > How about svn and svk. Or svn with local git tools. You can get what you > > > want, and I can get what I want. > > > > What are your reasons for wanting svn? > Familiarity. Proven reliability. Good documentation.
I could say the same about git for the first two. I have no idea how the quality of the documentation compares. If had to guess, I'd guess that svn's is probably better. > I can live with git (either through a GUI, if there is one), or I'll write > some scripts that do update and commit. I'd just prefer svn. There a couple of gui's: git-gui, qgit, giggle. I have no idea how good any of them are though. > I'm just interested in why did you bother to ask what kind of revision > control > system people wanted if git is the only answer you are willing to accept? git is the only answer I wanted. However, if Albert wasn't interested in using git then I'd have to accept a switch to svn. -Jeff _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
