Answering a little bit to myself. It seems like the branch has been pushed. You can get it via: git fetch ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/poppler/poppler kjk:kjk which creates local branch kjk matching remote branch kjk.
So I think I managed to get what I wanted. One thing that still bothers me is that "git push" pushes all of the branches, not just the current branch (which would be my expectation). -- kjk On 9/25/07, Krzysztof Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I created a local branch with git branch kjk, made some changes, > commited those changes locally and then did: > git push ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/git/poppler/poppler kjk > Which seemed to do something, but I'm not exactly sure what. > > When I did git pull on another repository, this new branch seems to > have been added: > $ git pull > Unpacking 14 objects... > 100% (14/14) done > * refs/remotes/origin/kjk: storing branch 'kjk' of > git://git.freedesktop.org/git/poppler/poppler > commit: c06f4c4 > Already up-to-date. > > but I can't see it (with git branch) or switch to it. > > Also, when I do git pull in the local branch that I hope I pushed, I get: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/poppler-auth$ git branch > * kjk > master > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/poppler-auth$ git pull > Warning: No merge candidate found because value of config option > "branch.kjk.merge" does not match any remote branch fetched. > No changes. > > Any idea what's the right way of: > * pushing locally created branch to main repo > * cloning/pulling from that repo in new repo > > Also, I noticed that in one local repo I can see (with git branch) > other branches (like xpdf302 etc.) from the server but not in other > local repo, although I'm pretty sure in both cases I did the same git > clone (not 100% sure, though). Any idea what causes branches to be > seen or not when cloning poppler repo? > > Thanks, > > -- kjk > _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
