On 9/26/07, Krzysztof Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/26/07, Jeff Muizelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:03:17PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: > > > gcc does not produce any code for this afaict. I can't understand why > > > visualc would be, unless you are just disassembling the .data section. > > > > It also looks like the table could be made const. > > Yes. I actually did that except it didn't show any improvements with > msvc so I didn't commit the change. But on unix at the very least it > should move this data to read-only of the dll, so less memory would be > used if multiple processes used libpoppler. Not 100% sure if the > presence of relocatable data (function pointers) doesn't prevent that.
If the functions are static, the function pointers in the table shouldn't generate relocations. Kristian _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
