Alle sabato 19 gennaio 2008, Jeff Muizelaar ha scritto: > > Always personally, I don't see the reason to use 0.7 just for beta/rc > > naming, instead of picking eg 0.7.80, 81, ... 90, and so on. After all, > > we are not the Linux kernel, nor a GNOME application. > > I don't understand your suggestion. Why would using 0.7.80 be better > than 0.7.0? Or did you mean 0.6.80?
Yes, I meant 0.6.80, sorry. > One probably with using something like: 0.6.80 is that you'd have to guess > how many prereleases you were going to have before going final. Yes and no: I can count 20 steps between x.80 and x+1.0 (x.80, x.81, etc). That means that if you "allocate" x.8y for alpha/beta releases and x.9y for the RC, you can happily do 10 between alphas and betas and 10 RCs. Aren't those enough? -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
