On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Diumenge, 24 de gener de 2010, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: >> A Diumenge, 24 de gener de 2010, David A Benjamin va escriure: >>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>>> A Dissabte, 23 de gener de 2010, David A Benjamin va escriure: >>>>> So, what is the story with GooVector? Is it just unknown copyright? >>>> >>>> Yes, it mentions three people in the copyright that never answered my >>>> mails asking to clarify which license their file was under. >>>> >>>>> Vectors are hardly complicated structures to implement. Making a new >>>>> one with a much fuller interface would be trivial. >>>> >>>> Yeah, but still somewhat time consuming. Are you volunteering to create >>>> one? GPL2 or later? >>> >>> Done. Rebased history including new GooVector at >>> >>> http://github.com/davidben/poppler/ >>> >>> File in question is here: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://github.com/davidben/poppler/blob/f62d5e579ec96f6b73adee0ffcad4367d >>> b 18e975/goo/GooVector.h >>> >>> It implements considerably more of std::vector's interface than the old >>> GooVector. I was having some fun. :-) >> >> Could you please send the patches? My git-foo is pretty low and i don't >> really know how to extract them correctly from your github branch > > Wait, the patches are probably the same just that i need to use your GooVector > isntead of ours, is that right? > > Albert > Yeah. I didn't want to resend them since nothing changed, and the new GooVector as a diff is ~useless since it's a completely new file. David _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
