A Dijous, 30 de setembre de 2010, Daniel Garcia Moreno va escriure: > El mar, 28-09-2010 a las 23:19 +0100, Albert Astals Cid escribió: > > A Dissabte, 18 de setembre de 2010, Daniel Garcia Moreno va escriure: > > > El vie, 17-09-2010 a las 19:33 +0100, Albert Astals Cid escribió: > > > > A Divendres, 17 de setembre de 2010, Daniel Garcia Moreno va escriure: > > > > > I've modified my patch to works as normal when !rawOrder and when > > > > > TextOutputDev.rawOrder makes selection with "raw" algorithm. > > > > > > > > > > This solution doesn't break current one and adds new functionality > > > > > to poppler. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think about it?, it's unneeded or it's a good feature > > > > > to add to poppler? I think it's useful, because I do it :P and > > > > > because it works for me... > > > > > > > > Not sure i understand you, are you suggesting that in raw mode we > > > > sort words (using secondaryCmp)? > > > > > > > > Then it's not raw anymore, is it? > > > > > > secondaryCmp is used to group text in lines in getSelectionText and to > > > group selection region by lines in getSelectionRegion, it doesn't > > > change text order. > > > > Question do you really need to "select" the text (i.e update the text > > painted on screen)? Or you only want to "retrieve" the text (i.e. get > > the raw text of the page)? > > Yes, I need it, because it works as expected with tables.
You can't answer "Yes" to two questions ;-) Are you answering "Yes" to the first or to the second? Albert > > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
