A Dilluns, 7 de març de 2011, Carlos Garcia Campos va escriure: > Excerpts from Albert Astals Cid's message of dom mar 06 21:15:58 +0100 2011: > > A Dissabte, 5 de març de 2011, Carlos Garcia Campos va escriure: > > > poppler/Annot.cc | 91 > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------- poppler/Annot.h > > > | > > > > > > 4 +- > > > > > > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > > > > > New commits: > > > commit 128dcaf282f418d8c45cea4df6ad4d3167b3e39c > > > Author: Carlos Garcia Campos <[email protected]> > > > Date: Sat Mar 5 13:12:49 2011 +0100 > > > > > > annots: Add AnnotBorder::parseDashArray() to parse dash arrays > > > > > > The code was duplicated in AnnotBorderArray and AnnotBorderBS > > > > As far as i understand this introduces a small behaviour change when > > if (array->get(3, &obj1)->isArray()) > > is not true in AnnotBorderArray since previously it was setting correct > > to false which in turn set width to 0 and now that does nto happen. > > > > Is this in purpose? > > Yes, I don't think we shouldn't draw any border just because the dash > array is invalid. This is for consistency with AnnotBorderBS that > creates a default dash array when when dict->lookup("D",&obj1)->isArray() > fails. Since the default for an AnnotBorderArray is drawing a solid > rectangle, we simply ignore the dash array if it's not valid. Reading > the code again I think we should only use the default dash array for > AnnotBorderBS when border style is dashed. I'll change that.
Some of those changes broke http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19906672/ClassSchedule_2091_ENGL.pdf can you please fix it? Thanks, Albert > > > Albert > > Regards, _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
