>ISO 32000-2 really ought to refer to the latest version of ISO 10646, yes?
>
Yes, it should. We simply need to make sure that nothing changed in
Unicode that would impact compatibility.
>Is there any real info available about what it in play for 32000-2?
>
I've talked about it at conferences in the past - so it's not secret.
Here are a few things:
Part 2 to be called PDF 2.0
Enhanced tagging/structure (from PDF/UA)
Document Parts (DParts) from PDF/VT
Various features of Acrobat 9/X
Integration of Flash/SWF (though this is coming up for discussion
again!)
Hierarchical attachments
Stronger encryption
And more...
Improvements to color
Incorporate OutputIntentfeatures of PDF/X-4 & 5
Support Black Point Compensation
Introduce page-level OutputIntents
Support for spectral data for spot colors (CxF)
Support for richer OutputIntent information for better Overprint
simulation
Associated Files (aka "Source Content")
Reader & Document Requirements
>I'm on the aiim.org lists, but haven't seen much there about 32000-2.
>
You must not be on the 32000 committee itself. Check with the
secretariat. There is no cost to join - everyone is welcome!! In fact, we're
meeting next week in Salt Lake City if anyone is in the area...
Leonard
_______________________________________________
poppler mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
