A Diumenge, 28 d'agost de 2011, Josh Richardson vàreu escriure: > I obviously can't review my own code, but I'd be happy to help review > other people's patches to pdftohtml as they come up -- contact me offline > to work out logistics if I can help. > > Also, Chegg is going to be building a regression suite for pdftohtml. > > 1. If my management agrees, would you be interested in having us > contribute it?
Maybe, what is it going to do? Test visually the rendered html? Do a simple diff between expected result and real result? > 2. Do you have any pointers or requirements for an integrated test > framework? I'm thinking to hook it up to "make test" in utils > directory.... make check is better, this way it will be checked when i run make distcheck to create the tarball. Albert > > Thanks, --josh > > On 8/28/11 6:02 PM, "Josh Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Albert, you are correct -- it doesn't matter to me when it goes in. I > >know others are waiting for it, but I imagine they can build from git and > >won't have to wait 3 months. Thanks for asking! > > > >--josh > > > >On 8/28/11 2:02 PM, "Albert Astals Cid" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi all, tomorrow is the supposed day for 0.18 beta 3. > >> > >>Of the 6 items listed in the todo: > >> > >>2 have been commited: > >> * [Bug 38586] support text rotation > >> * pdftocairo > >> > >>1 is not a feature (so can be introduced later): > >> * BOM and endianness of poppler::ustring class > >> > >>1 is in regtest process (looking good) > >> > >> * Creating PDF with poppler ? > >> > >>1 is yet to be finished: > >> * Form-Reset and Print [patches] > >> > >>1 is yet to be code reviewed: > >> * [Bug 39385] pdftohtml: add image and font extraction > >> > >>Since we are already ultra late with the 0.18 release i am proposing to > >>postpone the yet to be finished and the yet be code reviewed to poppler > >>0.20 > >>(that is supposed to be released "only" 3 months after 0.18 is > >>released). > >> > >>Obviously i do not care about the patch yet to be finished to be delayed > >>(or > >>otherwise i would not be suggesting this) so Josh, what do you say about > >>delaying a bit the release of your patch? > >> > >>I understand that you would not care much either since it seems you are > >>already using it internally, right? > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >> Albert > > > >_______________________________________________ > >poppler mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler > > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
