El Divendres, 2 de març de 2012, a les 11:13:24, Peter Breitenlohner va escriure: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > To be honest we do not want/like/encourage people using poppler core > > internals so adding this would be a "breach" of those ideals. OTOH it is > > a small-ish change and I remember some other people wanted it. > > > > Anyone else has an opinion on this? Carlos? Pino? Adrian? > > > >> Having POPPLER_VERSION (possibly under a different name) available in > >> poppler-config.h would be helpful when not using libpoppler-cpp. > > Hi Albert, > > I just see that poppler-config.h in the brand new 0.19.0 now defines > POPPLER_VERSION. Thanks. This is, however, #define'd as 0.19.0 and not as > "0.19.0". Is this a mistake or intentional?
This is intentional. > I don't see any use for that > other than immediate stringification, People can use it for ifdefs, tokenizing, etc > but if this is intentional we > certainly can adapt to it. > > Another point: compiling goo/GooString.cc yields many instances of > error: invalid conversion from 'char**' to 'const char**' > error: initializing argument 7 of 'static void GooString::formatInt > plus > error: prototype for 'void GooString::formatInt(...) does not match... > and the same for formatUInt (both with g++-3.4.6 and g++-4.6.2). > PLEASE FIXIT PLEASE DON'T SHOUT. Albert > > Regards > Peter Breitenlohner <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
