Cheers,
Albert
> Concerning functionality, I tried to stick to the current ways of
doing
> things as close as possible. So this really just replaces
"QDomDocument"
> with a custom data structure "SimpleTocNode." I also modified the qt4
demo
> to use the simple TOC interface, but hid the modifications behind an
> #ifdef. (I think one could replace the "QString" entries with the
actual
> poppler data structures like "Poppler::LinkDestination" and so on,
but I
> am trying not to get ahead of myself.)
>
> Hope this this your liking. Best regards, Adam.
>
> Am 21.03.2012, 00:17 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>:
> > El Dimecres, 21 de març de 2012, a les 00:03:03, Adam Reichold va
> >
> > escriure:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Am 20.03.2012, 23:49 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid
<[email protected]>:
> >> > El Dimarts, 20 de març de 2012, a les 14:50:59, Adam Reichold va
> >> >
> >> > escriure:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> >> I am currently maintaining a small PDF viewer called qpdfview
that
> >> >> is
> >> >> using the poppler library through the qt4 frontend. I have three
> >> >> question
> >> >> that came up during development:
> >> >>
> >> >> - The ArthurOutputDev seems incomplete. Are there plans on this?
> >> >
> >> > There's noone working on it, patches are welcome.
> >>
> >> I feared something like that. :-)
> >>
> >> >> Can
> >> >> someone point me to documentation about this?
> >> >
> >> > There's no documentation.
> >> >
> >> >> (I would like to use it for
> >> >> printing in a platform independent way for which I currently
fall
> >>
> >> back
> >>
> >> >> to
> >> >> drawing images to the printer. (I have seen a similar
workaround in
> >> >> Okular
> >> >> when built on Windows.))
> >> >>
> >> >> - The Poppler::Page::search method is deprecated but I could not
> >> >> find
> >> >> any
> >> >> documentation of what the plans for this are. Again, can someone
> >>
> >> point
> >>
> >> >> out
> >> >> relevant documentation to me?
> >> >
> >> > Use the non deprecated version of Poppler::Page::search?
> >>
> >> Oh. I assumed the version of search with the separate parameters
for
> >> the
> >> rectangle was just a convenience overload.
> >
> > You asumed wrong, the deprecation marker is clearly only on one of
them
> >
> > :-)
> > :
> >> Is it a long story why the first (easier?) one was deprecated?
> >
> > Because a QRect is uses qreal which are floats on some arches which
> > produces
> > comparison problems with poppler internals that use doubles.
> >
> >> >> - The Poppler::Document::toc method currently returns a
QDomDocument
> >> >> pointer. Is there any other way to get the TOC using this
frontend.
> >> >
> >> > No
> >> >
> >> >> I
> >> >> would like to avoid using QDomDocument as this alone would add
> >>
> >> libQtXml
> >>
> >> >> as
> >> >> a dependency to the program. Are there any opinions on replacing
> >> >> this
> >> >> by a
> >> >> simple custom tree model of the TOC?
> >> >
> >> > What's the problem of linking with libQtXml?
> >>
> >> I don't want to say that there is anything inherently wrong about
it.
> >> It
> >> just feels a little excessive to link that whole library for that
one
> >> feature. I feel like some of my users will care about adding
> >> dependencies.
> >
> > Sincerely I don't think your users will care about that, they care
about
> > features, not if your program is written in C++, C, Java or
whatnot, and
> > if
> > they care, you should be totally right to ignore them.
> >
> >> I also thought that extracting the information from the
QDomDocument is
> >> a
> >> bit cumbersome considering the rather well-known structure of the
TOC.
> >> But
> >> of course, I can always write some wrapper around that if really
feel
> >> the
> >> need to. So this is probably just an opinion.
> >
> > If you send a patch and it's not a lot of code we might consider it
for
> > inclusion. Feature for poppler 0.20 are frozen on thursday next
week.
> >
> > Albert
> >
> >> > Albert
> >> >
> >> >> Thank you for your help.
> >> >>
> >> >> Best regards, Adam.
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> poppler mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > poppler mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> >>
> >> Thanks again. Best regards, Adam.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> poppler mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > poppler mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
_______________________________________________
poppler mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
