El Dilluns, 3 de juny de 2013, a les 11:41:35, Mihai Niculescu va escriure: > On 06/03/2013 10:15 AM, Moritz Lipp wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 2013-06-03 09:41:41, Mihai Niculescu wrote: > >> Also, I am thinking of modifying the wrapper to also support Qt5 but I > >> dont know how to modify the build system (configure, makefiles) to > >> search for Qt5/Qt4, set libraries and moc accordingly and to set a > >> global variable to use it in the code in order to know which code to > >> enable: #ifdef QT5_VERSION > > > > You can use QT_VERSION and QT_VERSION_CHECK in the following way: > > #if (QT_VERSION >= QT_VERSION_CHECK(4, 4, 0)) > > > > Regarding the build system take a look at the configure.ac file and the > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES lines at line ~580 and the CMakeLists.txt at line ~100 > > but I have to admit that I am not familiar with the build system. Maybe > > this [1] is somewhat useful. > > > > Kind regards, > > Moritz > > > > [1] http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtdoc/cmake-manual.html > > Thanks, sure it helps! > > Now the second question, how do I make the code available to others? > > Also, I see in the TODO > (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/tree/TODO) that there is a > wish to make ArthurOutputDev optional. Why? Isn't it better for someone > who uses Qt and poppler-qt frontend to make use Arthur? Make Splash > optional.
Splash is billions of times better than Arthur. If you can make it as good sure, but meanwhile no point in making Splash optional. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers, > Mihai > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
