El divendres, 7 d’abril de 2017, a les 15:44:59 CEST, Russell McOrmond va escriure: > Replying to > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/2017-April/012147.html , On > Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Leonard Rosenthol > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can I assume that you are aware that JHOVE is NOT a PDF validator in any > > way? In addition, it’s support for modern PDF feature is quite out of > > date! And their own site > > (<http://jhove.openpreservation.org/modules/pdf/>) says as much. I > > suspect that if you ran these files through a more thorough PDF > > validation, such as the one in Adobe Acrobat Pro, it would not report any > > problems. > > > > Leonard > > Canadiana runs a preservation platform. We want to identify and > disallow files that aren't encoded in the publicly documented format > or that use features that aren't appropriate for long-term > preservation (PDF/A). What we need is a tool to take multiple PDF/A > files and join them together, with the result also being a PDF/A file. > This is something I presumed pdfunite could do, but that might not be > the case. > > If it turns out that poppler is using features that are > inappropriate for preservation then this would mean we need to > discontinue our use of poppler.
I don't understand your e-mail, does anywhere pdfunite does what you want it to do? As far as I can see, no. If you want pdfunite to do something it does not do, you can either open a bug in the bug tracker being *very specific* about what you think should be added/ changed/fixed or you can send a patch. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
