On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 14:20 +0330, Reza Hasanzadeh wrote: > Hey there, > I noticed that Poppler is licensed under the terms of GPLv2 and > GPLv3, so I thought it might be an option to release Poppler under > less protective licenses like LGPL or MPL just like Cairo or other > (major) libraries. Are there any reasons or considerations to this > licensing choice?
Poppler is a fork of Xpdf, which is GPL. -- Germán Poo-Caamaño https://calcifer.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
