On Thu, 2021-06-24 at 10:44 +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 24 de juny de 2021, a les 7:48:45 (CEST), Denis Bitouzé va > escriure: > > Hi, > > > > the joined `test.pdf` file is properly tagged as you can check it > > by > > loading it at: > > > > ┌──── > > │ https://www.ngpdf.com/loadFile > > └──── > > > > and then looking at: > > > > ┌──── > > │ https://www.ngpdf.com/editor/editFile > > └──── > > > > You can see each line of the code: > > > > ┌──── > > │ \pdfdict_new:n {l_my_action_dict} > > │ \pdfdict_put:nnn {l_my_action_dict}{Type}{/Action} > > │ \pdfdict_put:nnn {l_my_action_dict}{S}{/URI} > > │ \pdfdict_put:nnn {l_my_action_dict}{URI}{( > > https://www.latex-project.org)} > > └──── > > > > is a single tag. > > > > Nevertheless this code, if copied e.g. from Evince 3.38.1, is > > pasted not > > as it is and but as: > > That would be a question for the Evince developers (some of them are > on this is i guess so you may still get an answer). > > The fact that poppler has facilities to "see" the contents of tagged > pdf doesn't mean that evince is using them.
I am unsure what the report or question is about. Is it about presenting/seeing each tag separately or copying/pasting the test in the tags? If the later, that corresponds to poppler-glib. -- Germán Poo-Caamaño https://calcifer.org _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
