Good evening all, I'll get the popt maintainer at Fedora and Panu from Red Hat is likely to get co-maintainer once the package is reviewed. And for reviewing a package there should be no open bug reports at all, so I'm walking through these:
- Bugzilla Bug 102254: popt messages need explicit domain with dgettext() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102254 -> As per http://rpm5.org/cvs/chngview?cn=8187, this bug report IMHO seems to be partially solved; any comments Göran? - Bugzilla Bug 135428: popt : -help outputs unaligned descriptions, in case of <cellwidth> != <byte length> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135428 -> I would agree, it isn't possible to solve this bug report from the logical way Hu Zheng if this problem exists in latest popt, too. - Bugzilla Bug 178413: none UTF-8 messages for GNOME applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178413 The patch was merged into HEAD, but License/Copyright for the newly added files is missing, one of the Fedora guys claimed about this. - Bugzilla Bug 202061: Request for more user-friendly RPM documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202061 IMHO this bug report is resolved, as I can't see such an issue in a current popt version; the user-friendly thing is IMHO rpm not popt. Further comments or hints? Greetings, Robert ______________________________________________________________________ POPT Library http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List [email protected]
