dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> 于2018年8月28日周二 下午5:47写道： > > Hi Ao, > > as discussed at OCW, I need to first talk about the actual process with > others first, in order to ensure that this complex contribution > developed outside of OpenJDK can be accepted in the MIPS port project. > Your case is particularly complex, since there are multiple parties > involved in the development of the code. >
As far as I know, two companies have contributed code. They are Lemote and Loongson. They both signed OCA in 2016. > Once the summer vacation season is over, I'll be able to come back to > the you with a concrete proposal on how to organize the contribution. > > Once a proposal is discussed and agreed upon, then, given that the port > was developed outside of OpenJDK for 8 years, I expect that it will take > some time to go through its commit history, and remove what can't be > contributed. > Including two years, I started to try to contributed the code to the community:-) In addition to waiting, what do you suggest me to do? Could you tell me what can't be contributed, so I can remove them from now on. We can discuss this after your vacation. Thanks, and have a nice vacation! > Then we can discuss transitioning project roles, etc. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > On 26.07.2018 18:01, Ao Qi wrote: > > Hi Dalibor, > > > > Ping? > > > > Could you suggest me what should I do for bringing the port into the > > MIPS Porting Project? > > > > Thanks, > > Ao Qi > > Ao Qi <a...@loongson.cn> 于2018年6月19日周二 下午4:28写道： > >> > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I think that it's too late for a new a port come into JDK 8 Updates > >>> Project > >>> at this time, with less then a year to go under the current maintainers, > >>> considering how long it would take to bring the code into OpenJDK, run > >>> through the JEP process, code reviews, etc. > >>> > >>> It's probably too late for a fresh port to make it into JDK 11, as well, > >>> with less than a month to go until rampdown starts. > >>> > >> > >> Thank you very much for your reply and suggestion. I understand that > >> it is too late for a new port to be into the main line of jdk8u and > >> jdk11. > >> > >>> So my suggestion would be to start by bringing your port into the MIPS > >>> Porting Project, and then, once it's brought forward to JDK 11 and there > >>> is > >>> a build passing JCK for Java SE 11, to go through the JEP process for > >>> inclusion in a later version of the JDK. > >>> > >> > >> I think your suggestion is very reasonable, helpful and acceptable. We > >> are willing to adopt your suggestion. However, I have one question > >> about your suggestion. Could you explain more about bringing our port > >> into the MIPS Porting Project? I'm not quite sure what it specifically > >> means. Is that we can put our code into OpenJDK repository (not the > >> main line) like aarh64 jdk8u[1] and the further development should > >> happened according to community requirements, such as [2][3]？ > >> > >> [1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/aarch64-port > >> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws > >> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute > >> > >>> cheers, > >>> dalibor topic > >>> > >>>> > > -- > <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961 > <tel:+491737185961> > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 > > Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher > > <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment
