Hi all,

Apologies - I replied privately as opposed to the list:

We (Microsoft) are not testing Win x86 on tip and are not shipping Win x86 
binaries, so from our perspective it can be skipped.

Same gores for Eclipse Temurin binaries from the Eclipse Adoptium project.

Can't speak to Bellsoft, Azul etc who may still have an interest here.

Cheers,
Martijn (He/Him)

NOTE: My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to 
read or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours.
________________________________
From: porters-dev 
<porters-dev-r...@openjdk.org><mailto:porters-dev-r...@openjdk.org> on behalf 
of Jorn Vernee <jorn.ver...@oracle.com><mailto:jorn.ver...@oracle.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 4 July 2023 09:31
To: porters-dev@openjdk.org<mailto:porters-dev@openjdk.org> 
<porters-dev@openjdk.org><mailto:porters-dev@openjdk.org>
Subject: Who's testing Windows x86?

Hello,

I know the Windows x86 port is deprecated, but as far as I know,
officially that means it is still maintained until it is actually
removed. Is anybody still running tests on Windows x86? We (Oracle) have
the ability to do builds, but not run tests. Testing seems broken when I
tried it locally as well.

I have a patch that touches Windows x86 code [1], which is currently
waiting for testing on Windows x86. If there is no interest in keeping
this port maintained, I could skip the testing on Windows x86.

Thanks,
Jorn

[1]: 
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenjdk%2Fjdk%2Fpull%2F14523&data=05%7C01%7Cmartijn.verburg%40microsoft.com%7Cbcb84d132381425724de08db7c0cf77e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638240167451316998%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=B4OV6Dq61AB%2BI8sHXAxW43X9OOJF4T9nMZe0KryQoho%3D&reserved=0<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14523__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!KGhZGivv1cSmr3uhCaSPS2l6o36o2Zv_L4jJyWMvKTITmQJK9hoK0H9dnXP1cFIpg1w3XhD9c8nSZUCE5b0Qs_K9hBaLVA$>

Reply via email to