My thanks to all as well, a really fine gathering. In the interests of full disclosure, here's my blogged write-up, fair warning in advance that it's really a splat against the wall of my whole day, not tightly focused on our event:
http://mybizmo.blogspot.com/2009/08/ppug-2009811.html I've incorporated quite a few links, including to your slides Adam, and to Igal's write-up on this list. If anyone has the patience to slog through it and finds something egregiously wrong (from a technical standpoint), I'd happily make a correction here and there. I don't actually say much though, so I'm guessing we'll just let it slide (I did manage to grab that "bug detector" picture -- pretty cool). Kirby On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Adam Lowry<[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Igal Koshevoy wrote: >> >> 2. Adam Lowry presented "Testing My Patience", discussing testing in >> Python > > Thanks for the write-up, Igal. My slides and a few notes are up: > http://adam.therobots.org/2009/8/12/testing-my-patience > > py.test is actually a more powerful tool than nose, in general, but I'd > still recommend starting with nose. > > The other mocking library I mentioned is mocker: > http://labix.org/mocker > > It works in the record->replay model, like Mox. It was harder for me to > understand, but it might be better for you. It's also been around longer. > > The very simplest mock library is python-mock: > http://python-mock.sourceforge.net/ > > Designing a system to handle your functional test setup can be troublesome, > but I'm happy to help if I can. > > Adam > _______________________________________________ > Portland mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/portland > _______________________________________________ Portland mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/portland
