But Google Groups pretty well messed up what utility it grabbed from Deja News, and made a useless alternative to Usenet. Google always seems to cancel the products I actually use and keep the ones that aren't different enough from other available products.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:39 AM, kirby urner <[email protected]> wrote: > An honest suggestion. I have an "it was religious before I got here" > attitude. > > Just there's nothing wrong or pathological about sticking with mailman, > especially for Python groups. > > I met a guy who's whole mission was to convince banks that letting Gmail > provide an inhouse email solution was secure enough. > > Multnomah County uses it and so does my employer. > > Yes, I know Gmail and Google Groups are different services, I'm just > nodding at your suggestion to say "yes Google is highly trusted by lots of > groups, not an off-the-wall idea." > > Kirby > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Robb Shecter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sounds religious; I'll back off. > > > > On Sunday, September 15, 2013, kirby urner wrote: > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/portland/attachments/20130916/7901e4d4/attachment.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Portland mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/portland > -- Kai Jones [email protected] Smartass by nurture as well as nature. Oh, and I'm contrary, too. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/portland/attachments/20130916/123dad7f/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Portland mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/portland
