On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 05:35:18PM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:48:01 +0100 > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the report but you're slightly wrong in the diagnostic :) > > Ah, cool. Glad to hear that there were/are considered design decisions behind > the implementation. > > > sqlite3-tcl is built against tcl-8.5. The real problem is that > > sqlite3-tcl requires a tcl interpreter with threads support. Tcl 8.5 > > threads support is disabled by default (upstream's decision, not > > ours). > > > > I made this patch for you but we can't commit it because this type of > > change could to break old tcl packages. > > That's good to know when evaluating the portability of TCL-8.5 scripts > [on/in]to the OpenBSD platform. > > I built SQLite3 (with fts5 support) for my local development. I might build a > local Tcl-8.5 with threads support. If Tcl-8.5 and Tcl-8.6 can use the same > SQLite [executable] library, it might make sense to use a custom/local > Tcl-8.5. > > Thanks for the informative response! :) > > How might the Tcl and SQLite-Tcl ports/packages change in the near future? Or > is it highly probable that they will remain fairly similar to the way they > are in 5.8-stable?
CCing to MAINTAINER. He knows better than me. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
