On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:59:02PM -0600, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> CVSROOT:      /cvs
> Module name:  ports
> Changes by:   [email protected]   2020/03/30 15:59:02
> 
> Modified files:
>       net/freeradius3: Tag: OPENBSD_6_6 Makefile distinfo 
>       net/freeradius3/patches: Tag: OPENBSD_6_6 
>                                patch-raddb_radiusd_conf_in 
>                                patch-src_main_tls_c 
>       net/freeradius3/pkg: Tag: OPENBSD_6_6 PLIST-iodbc PLIST-main 
>                            PLIST-mysql PLIST-pgsql 
> 
> Log message:
> MFC update to freeradius (3.0.19->3.0.21) - the previous version
> 3.0.20 fixed a crash in EAP-PWD when concurrent EAP-pwd handshakes are
> initiated; 3.0.21 reverts a change made in 3.0.20 that causes a crash
> with duplicate clients.
> 

it seems there is a problem with the patches on -stable, are they still needed?

+++ Tue Mar 31 14:16:59 MDT 2020
===>  Patching for freeradius-server-3.0.21
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-configure
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-configure,v 1.9 2019/04/18 17:27:18 sthen Exp $
|
|Don't allow picking up collectdclient, freeradius autoconf's "smart"
|library detection doesn't offer a nice way to do it.
|
|Index: configure
|--- configure.orig
|+++ configure
--------------------------
Patching file configure using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 7133.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-doc_README
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-doc_README,v 1.3 2018/04/19 20:48:31 sthen Exp $
|
|Be explicit about the path; there is also /usr/sbin/radiusd in base.
|
|Index: doc/README
|--- doc/README.orig
|+++ doc/README
--------------------------
Patching file doc/README using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 120.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 166.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-raddb_certs_Makefile
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-raddb_certs_Makefile,v 1.7 2018/03/08 14:09:43 sthen Exp $
|
|Don't rely on gmake.
|
|Index: raddb/certs/Makefile
|--- raddb/certs/Makefile.orig
|+++ raddb/certs/Makefile
--------------------------
Patching file raddb/certs/Makefile using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 20.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 44.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-raddb_radiusd_conf_in
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-raddb_radiusd_conf_in,v 1.4.4.1 2020/03/30 21:59:02 sthen Exp $
|Index: raddb/radiusd.conf.in
|--- raddb/radiusd.conf.in.orig
|+++ raddb/radiusd.conf.in
--------------------------
Patching file raddb/radiusd.conf.in using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 135.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 501.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-scripts_libtool_mk
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-scripts_libtool_mk,v 1.2 2015/12/10 09:56:45 sthen Exp $
|
|Don't hide command lines.
|
|--- scripts/libtool.mk.orig    Wed Nov 11 15:50:54 2015
|+++ scripts/libtool.mk Wed Nov 11 15:51:19 2015
--------------------------
Patching file scripts/libtool.mk using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 69.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-src_main_detail_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_main_detail_c,v 1.5 2017/05/30 13:12:30 sthen Exp $
|
|Cope with 32-bit arch with 64-bit time variables.
|
|Index: src/main/detail.c
|--- src/main/detail.c.orig
|+++ src/main/detail.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/main/detail.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 784.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-src_main_radsniff_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_main_radsniff_c,v 1.4 2018/01/16 13:47:46 sthen Exp $
|
|OpenBSD libpcap uses nonstandard "bpf_timeval" variables which are a
|different size to timeval on some arch..
|
|This patch is enough to let it build but is incomplete and unlikely to
|allow radsniff to actually work.
|
|Index: src/main/radsniff.c
|--- src/main/radsniff.c.orig
|+++ src/main/radsniff.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/main/radsniff.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 1003.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1038.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1135.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1259.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1339.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1489.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1510.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1539.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1621.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-src_main_tls_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_main_tls_c,v 1.7.4.1 2020/03/30 21:59:02 sthen Exp $
|
|Index: src/main/tls.c
|--- src/main/tls.c.orig
|+++ src/main/tls.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/main/tls.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 2122.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2334.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3222.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 3232.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 3243.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch 
patch-src_modules_rlm_eap_types_rlm_eap_fast_eap_fast_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_modules_rlm_eap_types_rlm_eap_fast_eap_fast_c,v 1.1 
2018/10/24 17:15:25 jsing Exp $
|
|Index: src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/eap_fast.c
|--- src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/eap_fast.c.orig
|+++ src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/eap_fast.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/eap_fast.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 44.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to 
src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/eap_fast.c.rej
done
***>   patch-src_modules_rlm_eap_types_rlm_eap_fast_eap_fast_c did not apply 
cleanly
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch 
patch-src_modules_rlm_eap_types_rlm_eap_fast_rlm_eap_fast_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_modules_rlm_eap_types_rlm_eap_fast_rlm_eap_fast_c,v 1.1 
2018/10/24 17:15:25 jsing Exp $
|
|Index: src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/rlm_eap_fast.c
|--- src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/rlm_eap_fast.c.orig
|+++ src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/rlm_eap_fast.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_eap_fast/rlm_eap_fast.c using Plan 
A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 181.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 205.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-src_modules_rlm_realm_trustrouter_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_modules_rlm_realm_trustrouter_c,v 1.3 2019/04/18 17:27:18 
sthen Exp $
|
|Index: src/modules/rlm_realm/trustrouter.c
|--- src/modules/rlm_realm/trustrouter.c.orig
|+++ src/modules/rlm_realm/trustrouter.c
--------------------------
Patching file src/modules/rlm_realm/trustrouter.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 323.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 331.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-src_modules_rlm_unix_rlm_unix_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-src_modules_rlm_unix_rlm_unix_c,v 1.1 2015/11/19 14:19:05 
sthen Exp $
|--- src/modules/rlm_unix/rlm_unix.c.orig       Thu Nov 19 14:13:59 2015
|+++ src/modules/rlm_unix/rlm_unix.c    Thu Nov 19 14:14:18 2015
--------------------------
Patching file src/modules/rlm_unix/rlm_unix.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] Hunk #1 
succeeded at 218.
done
*** Error 1 in net/freeradius3 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2660 
'/build/tmp/pobj//freeradius-server-3.0.21/.patch_done': @if...)
*** Error 1 in net/freeradius3 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2006 
'/home/packages/amd64/all/freeradius-3.0.21.tgz')
*** Error 1 in net/freeradius3 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2472 
'_internal-package')
*** Error 1 in net/freeradius3 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2451 
'package')
--- Tue Mar 31 14:24:49 MDT 2020

Reply via email to