On Friday, September 25, 2020 5:29 PM, Brian Callahan <bcal...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, September 25, 2020 5:25 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org > wrote: > > > On 2020/09/25 21:23, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > > > Hi Stuart -- > > > On Friday, September 25, 2020 5:19 PM, Stuart Henderson > > > s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > > > > > > > On 2020/09/25 21:17, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Stuart -- > > > > > On Friday, September 25, 2020 5:11 PM, Stuart Henderson > > > > > s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020/09/25 15:04, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > > > > > > Module name: ports > > > > > > > Changes by: bcal...@cvs.openbsd.org 2020/09/25 15:04:29 > > > > > > > Removed files: > > > > > > > audio/exaile : Makefile distinfo > > > > > > > audio/exaile/patches: patch-Makefile patch-data_exaile_desktop > > > > > > > patch-plugins_Makefile > > > > > > > patch-tests_xl_trax_test_track_py > > > > > > > patch-tools_generate-launcher > > > > > > > patch-xl_main_py > > > > > > > audio/exaile/pkg: DESCR PLIST > > > > > > > Log message: > > > > > > > Remove audio/exaile > > > > > > > It is still living in Python 2 land, and while there exists a > > > > > > > collection > > > > > > > of PRs and issues on GitHub that explain what needs to be done to > > > > > > > migrate > > > > > > > to Python 3, no one has done it. There are lots of good > > > > > > > alternatives. > > > > > > > Requested by and ok aja@ > > > > > > > > > > > > since what needs to be done is "wait for 3.1 release, update" it's > > > > > > hard > > > > > > to say if anybody is doing that or not > > > > > > > > > > Antoine asked for its removal and I wasn't stepping up to maintain > > > > > this, and so I wasn't willing to stand in the way. We can always > > > > > revive this later if it ever does get updated. As I understood things, > > > > > exaile was blocking other ports work. > > > > > ~Brian > > > > > > > > We can but it's more of a pain to revive after it's been rm'd. > > > > Can we at least have a quirks.pm obsolete reason that isn't a lie? > > > > > > I was told that it wasn't being maintained upstream so that's the one > > > I chose. Looks like there is activity so I will change quirks.pm. > > > Though I don't see one that looks too great. > > > "python2 port superseded by python3 version", #14 maybe? > > > > It is no problem to add a new one reason. I'm not sure what it would say > > though because there are quite a few ports that are py2-only which we > > cannot remove.. > > How does "Python 2; requires obsolete and removed version of Python 2 > modules" sound? That as far as I can tell is accurate. > > ~Brian ...which is effectively what 13 says
