On Thu, 07 Jan 2021, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:29:55AM -0700, Paco Esteban wrote: > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > Module name: ports > > Changes by: [email protected] 2021/01/07 01:29:55 > > > > Modified files: > > www/py-requests-toolbelt: Makefile distinfo > > www/py-requests-toolbelt/pkg: PLIST > > > > Log message: > > update of www/py-requests-toolbelt to 0.9.1 > > > > 3 tests fail because it attemtps to make network connections. Left > > a comment on the Makefile as per sthen's suggestion. > > > > ok sthen@ > > Does not patch.
That patch is not needed anymore, as it's integrated upstream. I forgot to remove the file on cvs. Should be ok now. Thanks for the heads up ! > > ===> Patching for py-requests-toolbelt-0.9.1 > ===> Applying OpenBSD patch > patch-requests_toolbelt_adapters_socket_options_py > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |$OpenBSD: patch-requests_toolbelt_adapters_socket_options_py,v 1.1.1.1 > 2017/03/17 07:48:46 sthen Exp $ > |--- requests_toolbelt/adapters/socket_options.py.orig Fri Mar 17 > 07:42:45 2017 > |+++ requests_toolbelt/adapters/socket_options.py Fri Mar 17 07:43:47 2017 > -------------------------- > Patching file requests_toolbelt/adapters/socket_options.py using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 104. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to > requests_toolbelt/adapters/socket_options.py.rej > done > ***> patch-requests_toolbelt_adapters_socket_options_py did not apply > cleanly > ===> Failed patches: > patch-requests_toolbelt_adapters_socket_options_py > > *** Error 1 in . (/hack/cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2800 > '/hack/objdirs/pobj/py-requests-toolbelt-0.9.1/.patch_done': @if cd /us...) > *** Error 2 in /usr/ports/www/py-requests-toolbelt > (/hack/cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2584 'patch': > @lock=py-requests-toolbelt-0...) > > > > -- > Antoine > -- Paco Esteban. 0x5818130B8A6DBC03
