On 2010/04/06 13:35, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > all at once is a good idea, but no point waiting for a bulk > > and sifting through all the lib-depends-check output (which is > > a right pain..). the list below should be most of them. > > > > wonder if we should handle this via a cairo.port.mk though, > > it's a lot easier to bump just PKGNAMEs than also go through > > fixing up WANTLIB... > > Well, I would not be very happy to create a new module just for that. > WANTLIB management sucks that's for sure, but so far no one came up with > that great idea that would ease the pain. > > Looking at your list is depressing... especially since we end up doing > this batch WANTLIB commits at least twice per release now.
yup. it was pretty clean before (maybe 1 or 2 missing at the most). at least it's still hugely better than bumping a huge bunch of ports just because of a lib bump in a dependency (like some OS seem to do...)
