On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 22:12:54 -0600 (MDT)
Kurt Mosiejczuk <[email protected]>:

> CVSROOT:      /cvs
> Module name:  ports
> Changes by:   [email protected]    2021/06/11 22:12:54
> 
> Modified files:
>       lang/python/3.8: Tag: OPENBSD_6_9 Makefile distinfo 
>       lang/python/3.8/files: Tag: OPENBSD_6_9 CHANGES.OpenBSD 
>       lang/python/3.8/patches: Tag: OPENBSD_6_9 patch-Makefile_pre_in 
>                                patch-Modules__hashopenssl_c 
>                                patch-Modules__ssl_c patch-configure_ac 
>                                patch-setup_py 
>       lang/python/3.8/pkg: Tag: OPENBSD_6_9 PLIST-main PLIST-tests 
> 
> Log message:
> MFC Python 3.8.10
> 
> Includes multiple security fixes.
> 

it doesn't build either, it seems the same kind of issue that 3.9
has

+++ Fri Jun 11 22:39:46 MDT 2021
===>  Patching for Python-3.8.10
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Lib_test_test_locale_py
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Lib_test_test_locale_py,v 1.1 2019/11/07 16:14:09 kmos Exp $
|
|http://bugs.python.org/issue25191
|
|Index: Lib/test/test_locale.py
|--- Lib/test/test_locale.py.orig
|+++ Lib/test/test_locale.py
--------------------------
Patching file Lib/test/test_locale.py using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 564.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to Lib/test/test_locale.py.rej
done
***>   patch-Lib_test_test_locale_py did not apply cleanly
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Makefile_pre_in
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Makefile_pre_in,v 1.1.6.1 2021/06/12 04:12:54 kmos Exp $
|
|Index: Makefile.pre.in
|--- Makefile.pre.in.orig
|+++ Makefile.pre.in
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile.pre.in using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 646.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Modules__hashopenssl_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Modules__hashopenssl_c,v 1.2.2.1 2021/06/12 04:12:54 kmos Exp $
|
|Index: Modules/_hashopenssl.c
|--- Modules/_hashopenssl.c.orig
|+++ Modules/_hashopenssl.c
--------------------------
Patching file Modules/_hashopenssl.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 37.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Modules__ssl_c
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-Modules__ssl_c,v 1.2.2.1 2021/06/12 04:12:54 kmos Exp $
|
|XXX maybe the second hunk can go away now we have auto-init, I'm not sure
|exactly what python's lock protects
|
|Index: Modules/_ssl.c
|--- Modules/_ssl.c.orig
|+++ Modules/_ssl.c
--------------------------
Patching file Modules/_ssl.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 144.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 214.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-configure_ac
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-configure_ac,v 1.2.2.1 2021/06/12 04:12:54 kmos Exp $
|
|#1: Set ports library version
|#2: Don't pick up an installed linux/e2fsprogs libuuid.so
|
|Index: configure.ac
|--- configure.ac.orig
|+++ configure.ac
--------------------------
Patching file configure.ac using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 126.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2811.
done
===>   Applying OpenBSD patch patch-setup_py
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|$OpenBSD: patch-setup_py,v 1.1.6.1 2021/06/12 04:12:54 kmos Exp $
|
|Index: setup.py
|--- setup.py.orig
|+++ setup.py
--------------------------
Patching file setup.py using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] 
Hunk #1 succeeded at 942.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1660.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1843.
done
===>   Failed patches: 
    patch-Lib_test_test_locale_py

*** Error 1 in lang/python/3.8 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2822 
'/build/tmp/pobj//Python-3.8.10/.patch_done': @if cd /home/p...)
*** Error 2 in lang/python/3.8 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2134 
'/home/packages/amd64/all/python-3.8.10.tgz': @cd /home/port...)
*** Error 2 in lang/python/3.8 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2623 
'_internal-package': @case X${_DEPENDS_CACHE} in  X) _DEPEND...)
*** Error 2 in lang/python/3.8 (/home/ports//infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2602 
'package': @lock=Python-3.8.10;  export _LOCKS_HELD=" Python...)
--- Fri Jun 11 22:39:46 MDT 2021

Reply via email to