On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012/01/19 09:43, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Ouch, has upstream been notified? > > is there any point?
if like freebsd, you want to keep llvm as a future option, you need to have as much support for all arches as possible... looking at the freebsd llvm/clang page, they don't have either of sparc or sparc64 listed http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang >> And is sparc64 okay? > > well, it builds there, haven't really done any more with it on sparc64 beyond > that.
