On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:29:06PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> On 03/31/16 16:47, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:59:53AM -0600, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> >>CVSROOT: /cvs
> >>Module name: ports
> >>Changes by: [email protected] 2016/03/31 02:59:53
> >>
> >>Modified files:
> >> www/sope : Makefile distinfo
> >>
> >>Log message:
> >>Update to 2.3.9
> >>
> >>https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg23844.html
> >>
> >>Add PORTROACH marker to stick to the 2.X versions for the time being
> >I really don't like this.
> >PORTROACH markers are meant for permanent (or close to) things.
> >That kind of construct usually leads to totally forgotten ports because
> >you'll get no reminder that an update is pending.
> >
> >That said, I know your work on sogo and trust you. I just don't want it to
> >become a regular thing -- otherwise portroach would loose its appeal.
> >Or maybe it's just me...
> >
> the 2.x versions still receive updates, this way I hope portroach is helping
> me not to miss 2.x updates
> for the time being. (:
Sure. As I said, I trust you and that's a good reason.
I was just issuing a warning :-)
> The 3.x versions have a bleedingly revamped web interface, I'm still
> undecided, if I just upgrade, or
> change the layouts of the ports to have www/sogo/{2|3}/ so that people can
> choose.
I have no opinion because I don't know sogo. But usually having 2|3 for that
kind of things is the right way to go.
--
Antoine
