On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:06:14PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > > On Sep 26, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Marc Espie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > Module name: ports > > Changes by: [email protected] 2018/09/26 11:46:51 > > > > Modified files: > > lang/gcc/4.9 : Makefile > > > > Log message: > > unbreak the tree > > daniel@ is relatively new, but phessler@ and pascal@ are not. > > you guys should know better > > > > Right, the REVISION bump was in my original patch as I think REVISION bumps > are cheap and better to bump when not 100% sure, but I dropped it when told > it wasn’t needed.
PLIST change -> bump @comment %%alpha%% is pretty much visible, it ends up in the resulting plist. as opposed to actual %%alpha%% which will disappear. If you're unsure, proper testing will tell you... PLIST_DB is filled with register_plist. If you forget to bump a REVISION after a change, packaging *will* fail. ...which is how I noticed. Regular bulk builds will catch those mistakes.
