On 2021-08-09 14:53, George Mitchell wrote:
On 8/9/21 4:36 PM, Philipp Ost wrote:
[...]
# pkg check -Bdna
[...]
Checking all packages: 100%
llvm10 is missing a required shared library: libcxxrt.so.1
llvm10 is missing a required shared library: libc.so.7
llvm10 is missing a required shared library: libthr.so.3
llvm10 is missing a required shared library: libm.so.5
llvm10 is missing a required shared library: libncurses.so.8
llvm11 is missing a required shared library: libcxxrt.so.1
llvm11 is missing a required shared library: libc.so.7
llvm11 is missing a required shared library: libthr.so.3
llvm11 is missing a required shared library: libm.so.5
llvm11 is missing a required shared library: libncurses.so.8
llvm12 is missing a required shared library: libcxxrt.so.1
llvm12 is missing a required shared library: libc.so.7
llvm12 is missing a required shared library: libthr.so.3
llvm12 is missing a required shared library: libm.so.5
llvm12 is missing a required shared library: libncurses.so.8
[...]
My guess is that this is a pkg problem (or perhaps a pkg database
problem). It can be "fixed" by recompiling and reinstalling
llvm{10,11,12}. I've just been ignoring it since the message is
clearly nonsensical and there appear to be no operational problems
with llvm when I ignore them. It would be nice to get it fixed,
though. -- George
But libc and libthr are used in a huge number of ports. Why does this
only happen with these three llvm ports and not, say, every port written
in C? I should have dozens of ports claiming libc, libthr, libutil,
libcrypto, etc are missing shared libraries, but it's just this one.
Also, rebuilding and reinstalling llvm didn't fix it for me.
