On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:24 PM Guido Falsi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14/10/21 13:07, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It seems recently some committers are working to add CPE information > > to many ports. I don't know why it started. But if it is intended to > > add CPE information to all (or most of ) ports, isn't it better to > > modify ports framework so CPE intormation is added to each ports by > > default? > > AFAIK that's already in the tree. The framework tries to extrapolate CPE > information from PORTNAME and other variables. > > > Unluckily most of the time it is actually impossible to get correct > information and some other variables with the correct details, which are > not necessarily logical or in any way connected with the information > already present) need to be added by hand after manual discovery.
That's correct. The CPE support in the portstree is in Mk/Uses/cpe.mk since 2014. The current attempt (chkcpe) is to add CPE_VENDOR and if needed CPE_PRODUCT to as many ports as possible. The problem is that CPE_VENDOR is a non deterministic value and often multiple choice. So when you see a commit that adds CPE_VENDOR then this is only the last part of the whole workflow. http://github.com/decke/chkcpe -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/
