* Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> [20211016 21:15]: > Please keep shar and classic diff patches supported. Git is not the only > tool for everybody on this planet.
I don't think it makes too much sense to put them into the same
sentence. As for me (see my original mail), I really think any patch
("unified diff") that can be parsed by the patch tool should be
supported. I just suggest that the 'git format-patch' format should be
preferred.
As for shar, I don't really see the advantage here. If you want to go
down the "fully manual" route, can't you use e.g. 'diff' all the way?
Anyways, getting rid of shar was just a side note aka additional idea
and isn't really important for what I suggested ;)
BR, Felix
--
Dipl.-Inform. Felix Palmen <[email protected]> ,.//..........
{web} http://palmen-it.de {jabber} [see email] ,//palmen-it.de
{pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt // """""""""""
{pgp fingerprint} A891 3D55 5F2E 3A74 3965 B997 3EF2 8B0A BC02 DA2A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
