On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:23:09AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Need an opinion on what license type should be choosed for: > LICENSE > --- > Copyright 1991, 1992, 1994, 1998, 1999, 2002 William D. Norcott > License to freely use and distribute this software is hereby granted > by the author, subject to the condition that this copyright notice > remains intact. The author retains the exclusive right to publish > derivative works based on this work, including, but not limited to, > revised versions of this work
That is pretty much the definition of "not free" software. I went to look
at graphics/xv to find what it does and found:
License: not specified in port
I'm curious to see how this turns out, and as such would be grateful if
you'd make a noise about it if you hear anything off-list.
--
Mason Loring Bliss (( If I have not seen as far as others, it is because
[email protected] )) giants were standing on my shoulders. - Hal Abelson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
