On Sat, Aug 27, 2022, 17:31 Felix Palmen <[email protected]> wrote: > * Michael A. Oshin <[email protected]> [20220827 17:26]: > > Thanks everyone. I missed those reply because I subscribed to a daily > > digest. > > I took you on CC now. Please also consider my other answers I added to > the list only. > >Thanks Felix for your inputs. I shall merge them and run the patch. It was also suggested to change the category to net-im despite saying that pidgin-otr and libotr were in the security category and that these ports were based on that choice. Maybe, pidgin-lurch & liblurch go to net-im while libomemo etc remain in the security category.
> > > I shall drop the use GH then, @Cy had earlier recommended it. > > To clarify: In general, explicit distfiles prepared by upstream are > preferred if available. Sometimes, these distfiles introduce problems in > which case USE_GITHUB is preferred nevertheless. > > Thanks for the further clarification. > > I don't see such a problem with the distfile here, but maybe Cy can > clarify ;) > > Cheers, Felix > > -- > Felix Palmen <[email protected]> {private} [email protected] > -- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de > {pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt > {pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231 >
